January 29-30, 2010
Go-golly, how much?
“A
garment is always a travesty.” – Leon Stilman in his afterword to Gogol’s The Diary of a Madman and Other Stories (1960).
“The
Overcoat.” At least poor Akaky
Akakievich returns as a ghost, if only for a matter of days – if only the rumor
of a ghost.
“Diary
of a Madman.” Talking lap dogs, fish speaking
in hieroglyphics.
“A dog is an extraordinary politician and notices everything, every step
a human takes.” Moreover, he can disappear into the furniture and watch unseen,
even in plain sight. Like a child.
“I
need spiritual food and I am served these inanities.” Who said that? What if I need inanities and I have to eat –
and most solemnly – spiritual food, having been in the kitchen and knowing what
goes into the pot.
The
friends you have as a child, when there are nothing but inanities (profound though
they may be): why do those friendships “work”? come with so little
friction? It isn’t that you haven’t yet learned
pretense – you begin learning that in the crib – but you reserve it for your
relationships with adults.
Then you become an adult. Or, you pretend you have.
It isn’t
only pretense that makes us successful, however. It’s luck, and where luck
fails trickery, and whether trickery fails (or succeeds) a forgiving conscience.
How
forgiving?
The earthquake in Haiti has at least expanded
the radio’s attention from dollars and cents to dollars and destruction, though
with due emphasis on the dollars and cents needed to fix the destruction. Don’t
send food. Don’t send water. Don’t send medicine. Send dollars. Dollars!
Did you hear about the Lehman Brothers
executive that gave his entire six-burglazillion-dollar bonus to Haitian
relief? Of course not! You did hear,
though, that Hollywood raised 4.4 bogusillion in exchange for only several hours
of face time on several outlets around the globe (meaning the northwestern quadrasphere).
Here’s
the epigraph in context:
“
‘They receive you according to your clothes, they see you off according to your
wits,’ says a Russian proverb. Arkady never had wits, but for one day in his
life he had decent clothes and was received accordingly . . . . But is not a
garment also a disguise? Is it not deceit to be received according to your
clothes, not according to what you really are? Arkady in his new overcoat had
no more wit, or virtue, than in the older one. He was welcomed and feted thanks
to a travesty. But a garment is always a
travesty, and one has to wear a garment. A man dies of exposure if he
chooses not to wear one and to be undisguised, to be himself.”
travesty. [from
Fr. travesty pp. of travestir, to disguise; It. travestire, from L. trans, over, and vestire, to
dress] so “disguised by dress so as to be ridiculous; burlesqued.
n. 1. a
burlesque treatment, imitation, or translation for purposes of ridicule.
2. a crude and ridiculous representation; a ludicrous distortion. Wall Street. Hollywood. The radio.
2. a crude and ridiculous representation; a ludicrous distortion. Wall Street. Hollywood. The radio.
W
No comments:
Post a Comment