May 20, 2015
Why you should listen to me, never mind what I wrote yesterday
I wake up from an afternoon doze,
because the radio is talking: The
situation is complicated – it can’t be more complicated – but let me explain it
to you; I can do that, too . . . in terms you may well be able to
understand. The kings and queens of
smug.
There’s no monopoly on smug, though –
not among the media, not among the religious, not among
politicians, not . . .
. No
monopoly. There is no one willing to
close with my friend Gaspar Stephens’ favorite five words: But I could be wrong. He suggests
these be stamped at the end of any pontification. I suggest we stamp at the beginning these
six: From my limited point of view,
We don’t do
either, we don’t consider doing either, because come right down to it, in the
last analysis, in our heart-of-hearts,
we know we are right. Occasionally, we’ll
feign modesty. Still, our experience
trumps everyone else’s, because, well, we’re on the ground, and they – the media,
the religious, the litigious, politicians, and cosmologists, all of them – are in
the air.
It’s the adolescent’s petulant, “You
just don’t understand” in a wisp of intellectual fog, smuggery-smudgery; so the
edges aren’t so clear, but our hearts are. Just listen to the beat.
No comments:
Post a Comment