May 11, 2015
Holy Father Church
“We are all selfish beasts and without knowing quite why, we have so little
insight into ourselves.” – Uncle Albert
Holy Father Church
“We are all selfish beasts and without knowing quite why, we have so little
insight into ourselves.” – Uncle Albert
We
went to a Presbyterian church yesterday, one we were assured would ignore
Mother’s Day, because, to paraphrase that Israelite without guile, the disciple
Nathanael (John 1:46-57), “Can anything good come out of Kansas City?
It was
dismally awful. The music was mournful; the preaching was somber. (The text was
the tenth commandment: “Thou shalt not covet thy neighbour's house, thou shalt
not covet thy neighbour's wife, nor his manservant, nor his maidservant, nor
his ox, nor his ass, nor any thing that is thy neighbour's.”)
The music was mournful, but the Confession of Sin was like the singing of a National Anthem by a proud chorus of Montenegrins: “We have sinned, Almighty God, in thought, word, and deed. We have let the enemy put unkind, unholy, and unprofitable thoughts into our minds; we have failed to think the thoughts of love, peace, and righteousness Your Spirit would have given us had we asked. We have said things we ought not to have said, and withheld words of kindness, blessed reproof, and praise when they should have been said. We have been busy about many things that should not have occupied our time, and we have neglected to do those things that would have served others and pleased You. Therefore we condemn ourselves before You. We can only plead that Your grace and mercy be upon us, to forgive our sins, heal our broken places, and return us unto ways that are profitable to your kingdom: through Jesus Christ our Lord.”
What does he keep under his hat, our John? |
The music was mournful, but the Confession of Sin was like the singing of a National Anthem by a proud chorus of Montenegrins: “We have sinned, Almighty God, in thought, word, and deed. We have let the enemy put unkind, unholy, and unprofitable thoughts into our minds; we have failed to think the thoughts of love, peace, and righteousness Your Spirit would have given us had we asked. We have said things we ought not to have said, and withheld words of kindness, blessed reproof, and praise when they should have been said. We have been busy about many things that should not have occupied our time, and we have neglected to do those things that would have served others and pleased You. Therefore we condemn ourselves before You. We can only plead that Your grace and mercy be upon us, to forgive our sins, heal our broken places, and return us unto ways that are profitable to your kingdom: through Jesus Christ our Lord.”
It
rolled off our self-satisfied tongues like that patriotic hymn learned by heart;
then . . . silence. The lugubrious preacher had for this one moment the comic
timing of a Henny Youngman – the right silence, precisely the right weight,
timed to the second and: “God is merciful as well as just, ever ready to
forgive us, his erring children. As far as the East is from the West, so far
let the Lord put your sins from you. I declare it so: in the name of Jesus
Christ, you are forgiven.”
So he declared, perfectly timed; but I
was let down. Why? What had I hoped for? Maybe something like this: “God is merciful as well as just, but frankly
today he has his justice hat on. Don’t just sing your sins. Go fix that shit. By
that I do not mean the fog of ‘unkind,’ ‘unholy,’ or ‘unprofitable.’ At least try to fix stuff you’ve actually done.”
It was
a Presbyterian Church. Surely, had he said that, the Session would have called
an emergency meeting for immediately after worship. The matter of God’s resolute
justice would have been referred to the presbytery. A task force would have
been formed, the greatest talkers of each theological stripe brought together
to speak the truth boldly (and hold hard to their heart-felt grudges against
one another). They would “reason together,” precisely because they really wouldn’t
want to have anything else to do with each other – sit down in one or another’s
den and watch a ball game; picnic or play golf, certainly not drink a beer side
by side by side along one long bar. Of course, they would do any of these
things; assuredly they would! But at the end of the day what those bold theological
hearts desired truly was to get their tongues into a conference room and really
piss each other off. Then they could go home and whine to their poor spouses about
how unjustly misunderstood they had
been.
What the scholars
call an “excursus”*
:
I want sometime to write an apology
for what I will call “transparent hypocrisy,” meaning more than the tacit acknowledgement that not only do
we live in a fallen, therefore duplicitous world, but we are fallen and
duplicitous as well. What others have seen clearly, what they would know as
clearly, if they paused their talk to take one breath, idealists and ideologues
alike would say loud enough all can hear (themselves included): “Here are the hidden
rules I am playing by (and the ones I am making up as I go along); here is the
spiritual, emotional, or cash credit I’ve accepted to take this position.”
Then, today’s
sermon on the last commandment – could it become a true confession? - the
sermonizer himself, the one croaking “Fidelity!” at his congregation, could he
admit how long he has coveted his neighbor’s ass, how many times he has snuck
into the stable next door to whisper in a soft, warm ear, to rub along its neck
and down its back, along its flanks, as if it were one of his own. God be
merciful. God forgive him the nights, the dark, the opposite of transparent
hypocrisy.
He says none of this, of course. Like
all of us he hides his sin, how he does one thing while he says another. “Fidelity,”
he says – how important it is that we hew to it, for strait is the gate and
narrow the door.
I shake his hand as we leave. “Thank
you for that.” I, too, say what I don’t mean at all.†
What
was under Calvin’s hat – and, therefore,
always on his brain? For the R—rated
answer, click here. Must be 18 years of
age or older.
* From the Latin excurrere , to run off course. In
scholar speech though, as I understand it from my philosopher friend Tom Nashe,
it means: “I am, you see, wandering away from the path we set out on, but watch
how cleverly I am able to get back to it.”
† But then we are never more ourselves than when we are being truly hypocritical, homo
sapiens bisulcilinguus.
No comments:
Post a Comment