Tuesday, December 20, 2016
Monday, December 19, 2016
Sunday, December 18, 2016
The American Crifis
The American Crifis
Or
Tom Paine and the way he wrote her:
Another bit of
foolishness brought to you on 490 AM.
12.18.16
Saturday, December 17, 2016
Commitment, or how we got to this point.
Commitment
Or,
how we got to this place.
Let's say I work in H.R. in one of those “small but vibrant”
companies, where everyone knows everyone else, and this happened several weeks ago.
I come
into my office to complain to myself about me. Naturally, I TRY to
deflect the complaints, “Yes. Yes. I know. But you know that underneath he’s not a bad guy.” I’m not convinced:
“Yeah, I don’t know. Way underneath he’s, you know . . .” I circle my ear with my
forefinger.
Ultimately
I convince myself that my assurances about me are sounding pretty hollow. Officially,
I can’t admit as much, but I promise to take my complaints seriously.
And the
next day I call me in. On the one hand, I’m taken completely by surprise; but
on the other, I can’t disagree.
12.16.16
Thursday, December 15, 2016
Mad House
Wednesday, November 16, 2016
Two-thirds of three
Two-thirds of three
Corner Coffee |
Because something was happening
somewhere in the world – a broken Brazilian butterfly wing, an Orthodox priest having trouble micturating in Minsk, a leak in the Michelin man – something had
tweaked the schedule at work, and I had yesterday morning off, if I’d make it up, of course, somewhere along the
line at a time uneasily unspecified. So I was having coffee* with
Axel Sundstrøm, who wanted to talk more about centering prayer.** He’s
disturbed about any attempt to lasso and corral God, to put him inside; he’s also concerned about
what might be going on in peoples’ centers, their insides, especially
given what is going on in his. I share the latter concern – sadly, I can’t
imagine a soul disinterested in its own best interests. But every word about God is another strand of hemp
in the rope and every book of theology is an attempt to fence him in.
Still, I listened. I didn’t say to Axel what I just wrote to you,
because it didn’t occur to me until later. Then, his phone went off; then he
did. Then I moved from our table to the armchair in the corner of the window that
looks onto Bye Street, deciding “I’ll just sit for a minute.” After which I
needed to go home to dust. Roz had said the night before, “If you’re going to
have the morning off, you might at least dust.” She didn’t care what else I did
was the implication, but dusting was what pundits like to call – coughing the stern gravel they carry in their guts into their throats – “non-negotiable.”
Two young women were sitting at the
table next to the big chair, sisters surely – maybe even twins: the same dark
eyes, inky eyebrows, hard nose; the same high forehead and delicate chin. But the
neatly-cropped hair of the one as opposed to the wild mop of the other threw
everything off. They might be twins, but it was hard to tell; surely, though,
they were sisters: you could have told that with eyes closed by the way they talked
to one another – the complaining sister and the explaining sister.
Not these sisters. |
I didn’t follow the conversation as well as I would have liked. It was
murmuring for one thing; words were lost as they chuckled at each other like
doves. The angry dove and the shrugging-here-we-go-again dove. Whole sentences
were lost as they went back and forth from English to Spanish according to no
pattern I could discern. The plaining dove would say something in English, and
her patient sister would answer in Spanish; then they’d be Spanishing for an
exchange or two. Annoya raised her voice in English. She was mad at a mutual
acquaintance, a victim of . . . I didn’t hear what. “She keeps saying, you
know, ‘I’m different, so you have to listen to me, so shut up.’” Two paragraphs
later, the listening sister responded to something in Spanish – about eating I’m
pretty sure: “Mom says that’s not good for you.” “Yeah, well, Mom’s not good
for me.”
At settling that she got up and went toward the rest room. And I got up, bussed
my coffee cup and started up the hill toward home, thinking suddenly and a bit
sadly half-way there, I should have stayed a little longer. I needed another
nugget from the sarcastic sister. I wanted to write about her, but I hated
violating the “rule of three.”
“You really shouldn’t do things by two-thirds,” I thought.
11.16.16
______________
Friday, November 11, 2016
Off-center
Off-center
I was sitting at my desk. The phone
rang. It woke me up.
I
let it ring twice more. Humming. I was humming, because that’s supposed to
clear your voice. I looked at the clock; it wasn’t even ten yet – the morning
wasn’t half done. “Ted Riich,” I said.
“What?”
I said. “What did you quit?”
“Prayer.”
I waited. “Centering prayer.”
“Hmmm.”
“There’s
something wrong with it – it isn’t just me.”
“Of
course not.” I tried to put an edge in my voice, but who knows? It still felt
half-asleep, raspy, not at all clear.
The young Luther practicing de-centering prayer. |
“Yes,”
I said.
“Not
the course,” he went on. “I haven’t quit the course.” He paused. “Yet!” I
waited. “I may do that, too. You don’t want to come to the next session with
me, do you?”
“I
don’t think so.”
“No.
You wouldn’t. Not the course anyway, I didn’t quit the course; but I did quit
this morning. The prayer.”
“I
gathered.”
Then, he told me what he’d been
thinking. He was being pushed through the silence, this way and that and
swimming back toward his center with his magic word. The word was vanitas, the first word in Ecclesiastes
in the Vulgate. (Trust Axel to pick a magic word that way.) Then, he couldn’t
get back – to the center - because it occurred to him:
“It
occurred to me – very strongly – that the practice throws away, like so much
trash, the doctrine of irresistible grace.”**
“Hmmm,”
I said again.
“You
see, right? The practice suggests – very strongly
– it holds that we normally resist
God’s grace, so we have to make a place for it – light a candle, straighten our
back, clear our mind. Or, it suggests – no, again, it holds – that we normally wouldn’t recognize God’s grace if it hit
us over the head, we have to make our heads right. In the first place, it
short-changes God – if we don’t answer the door when he knocks, he can’t get
in? It doesn’t just short-change him, it demeans him. In the second case, it’s
a form of Gnosticism.”
“Explain
that again.”
“What?
You don’t get it?”
“No.
Gnosticism. Explain that.”
“It’s
just what I just said. Our heads have
to be right. We have to know certain things – especially how to do certain
things, and do them the right way – or else God is beyond us.”
“Isn’t
God beyond us?”
“No.
Dammit, no.”
There was someone on the other line. I
told Axel I had to answer it – in case it was “the Holy One in our midst,” I
said.
He
said, “Very funny.”
_______________
* More
about Axel Sundstrøm, my Lutheran pastor friend, here,
all the links fit to print from the time he showed up at a wake and had to be
driven home to the review of at least one sermon and mockeries of our various
conversations.
** For the even less initiated than I,
here is Van Harvey’s definition: “the grace that cannot be resisted by the will
of man.” If I do get it, it goes something like this: If God is God and we are
we, we can’t put him off. (Or her.) God comes to us when God comes to us. We
can zip our Bibles shut, wrap them in swaddling clothes, lay them in a manger, seal the whole package, Bible, swaddling clothes, and manger, in a
plastic bag, and throw the whole kit and kaboodle (like centering prayer does irresistible
grace) down a well; the Holy Spirit is like Houdini and will show back
up wherever and whenever it wishes.
11.11.16
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)