Tuesday, January 25, 2022

Future Perfect

 Future Perfect 

I mean the tense as in, “After we shall have sung the hymn, “O God, Our Help in Ages Past,” number 107, we shall hear from our guest preacher, NM.”

This was last Thursday. Roz had discovered that her “friend,” the Narrow Man, was preaching at St. Jude’s, so she thought she would go to church with Uncle Albert and me if we were going – if there were a service, then if we could make our way through the streets and sidewalks flooded with snow and coronavirus.
     “Well, if we can’t,” I said, “we can watch him on television.” “If,” Roz said, he can make his way through the flooded streets or St. Jude’s has a helicopter.”
     “Yes,” I said; then, when she turned and went toward the kitchen, began to think about “if.”

If I think about it, I find I am only vaguely interested in the future. Partly, it is a philosophical stance though an existential (brooding) thing, not a well-thought-out position. But it, the future, is, as far as I can see, completely unpredictable.
     That doesn’t mean that we don’t make plans that we can’t carry out – plans for ten minutes from now or tomorrow, for next week or next year. We write appointments in our calendars. We plan trips and begin to make arrangements for them. We act as if nothing will intervene. It is a convincing act (even when we buy travel insurance), and we are largely convinced. But we’re also aware that we are acting.
     All the world is not a stage we are playing on – we do know that too – that there are things happening backstage, in the audience, in the box office, and on the street in front of the theater* that may prevent Act IV from proceeding to Act V. Someone in the audience – or in the cast! – could have a heart attack. Someone in the box office could get it in his mind to throw the master switch in the breaker box. Two friends of a paralytic could unroof a section of the roof and let their friend’s limp-legged body down center stage front.
     None of these things would immediately change our plans because for a lengthy moment we would be without plans altogether. For another while, we would be uncertain that the way we had seen forward was still closed to us. At the same time, we would be wondering if it were still open to us. Was it ever actually a way?
     There might well be in the meantime people running around shouting directions at us, even directions based on a contingency plan. Officious jackanapeses reveling in their officiousness. Still, would they have any confidence that their instructions would be carried out? How many under their officious yelling would believe and follow? (What makes the paralytic stand up and walk? Does he know where he is going?)

We do plan. But at our core, we’re in a constant panic about our plans because we know we are pretending to know something we don’t. (What we know is that we are pretending.) We know the plans are an uncertain hedge against runaway inflation. (What plans did the paralytic make for his stroke?)

So, someone whirled the gazillions of ice-bats stratospherically circling the Valley and the gelid waste that they had dropped onto our sidewalks and streets was pushed aside and deodorized sufficiently that we could go outside without choking, we could walk without falling, we could drive to St. Jude’s for Morning Prayer. And the Narrow Man preached.
     But did anyone listen? Uncle Albert slept; not only were his eyes closed, he was also snoring, if so lightly to disturb any of the other eight widely-spaced people there for the early service. I tried to follow, but I lost the thread with the first break in it between the passage from Nehemiah and the passage from First Corinthians, for that is what he was doing, leading us from passage to passage – Nehemiah 8 to First Corinthians 12 to Luke 4 – or so he said. I did hear that much. And I heard more, but I was finding it hard to follow, trying to remember why Ezra held from on high that the Jews in the land, the ones that didn’t go into exile and come back but remained in the land, had to put away their wives and their children. For didn’t make them, the wives and the children, “widows and orphans and aliens in the land” to be afforded special care; yet, once put away, we don’t hear of them again, do we? So, I was leafing through the Bible in my mind because there aren’t any in the pews at St. Jude’s. And it was full of holes in the whole Chronicles saga.
     And Uncle Albert was asleep, not that I could consult his prodigious memory anyway.
 

Roz said on the way home, “Wasn’t that a good sermon?” And we both agreed. But I wondered how he, the Narrow Man, felt about it. Could he tell that no one but faithful Roz was paying attention? Did he feel like Whitman’s noiseless, patient spider, launching “filament, filament, filament” but not at all sure that a single “gossamer thread” would catch anywhere?
    
Maybe that’s what preachers always feel like. If they’re at all aware.
 

   01.25.22   

_______________________________________
 * and in the next street over, etc.
 

No comments:

Post a Comment